The paper 'The Personality of an Organization' is a perfect example of a business assignment. The growth and success of the organization depend largely on its culture, ethics, values, etc. A stable organization helps to enhance its productivity. The culture of a company helps to shape up the behavior of the organizational members. Strong organizational culture provides many advantages and disadvantages to the company. With the help of definite values and principles, the organization unites all its employees. The policies, decisions, and rules of a company depend largely on its ethical values.
Strong ethical values influence the company for performing many social activities. Now a day most companies are involved in performing social activities to benefit society and its people. This helps the company to attract more customers and build its position in the competitive market. Corporate social activities help to develop responsible management in the company. By doing such activities, companies can show that they are concerned about their profit and are also concerned about the environment, society, and people. The organization develops strategies for enhancing its business.
The power and politics of an organization are important for developing its strategies. Organizational members discuss and evaluate strategies with the help of organizational leaders. The leaders make plans to implement the strategies. Leaders use the power to implement change in the company. Sometimes many political issues damage or interfere in the organizational process. In this case study, all of these issues are discussed in detail. All of these factors influence the growth and success of the company. Its culture determines the personality of an organization. Organizational culture is determined by the practices and behavior of organizational members toward their job and colleague.
The culture of a company helps to shapes up the habits of its employees. Organizational culture is intangible.
Brooks, I. 2005. Organisational behaviour: individuals, groups and organisation. Harlow Financial Times Prentice Hall 2005.
Cannon, T., 2012. Corporate responsibility: governance, compliance and ethics in a sustainable environment. 2nd edition. Harlow: Pearson.
Crane, A. and Matten, D., 2007. Business ethics: managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Elms, H., Brammer, S., Harris, J. D., and Phillips, R. A., 2010. New Directions in Strategic Management and Business Ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(3), pp. 401-425.
Hardy, C. 1996. Understanding power: Bringing about strategic change. British Journal Of Management, 7, S3-S16.
Hardy, C., 1996. Understanding power: Bringing about strategic change. British Journal Of Management, 7(1), pp. 3-16.
Jennings, D. and Wattam, S., 1998. Decision making: an integrated approach.(2nd edition). London: Financial Times Pitman Publishing.
Jennings, D. and Wattam, S., 1998. Decision making: an integrated approach.2nd edition. London: Financial Times Pitman Publishing.
Johnson, G., Whittington, R., Angwin, D., Scholes, K., and Regnér, P. 2014. Exploring strategy: text & cases. 10th edition. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited
Lukes, S., 2007. Keywords: Power. Contexts. 6(3), pp. 59-61
McManus, J., 2011. Revisiting ethics in strategic management. Corporate Governance, 11(2), pp. 214-223.
Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B. W., & Lampel, J., 2009. Strategy safari: the complete guide through the wilds of strategic management. New York: Prentice Hall.
Schwenk, C. R., 1989. Linking cognitive, organizational and political factors in explaining strategic change. Journal of Management Studies, 26(2), 177-187.
Teale, M., Dispenza, V., Flynn, J. and Currie, D., 2003. Management decision making: towards an integrated approach. New York: Pearson.