Essays on Australian Emissions Trading Scheme Case Study

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper 'Australian Emissions Trading Scheme" is an outstanding example of a business case study.   Climate change is currently attracting much business attention around the world (Preston & Jones 2007), with increased activity by government and other stakeholders since the adoption of the Kyoto Protocol in 1997 (Pinkse 2007). The Kyoto Protocol recognises emissions trading as a key instrument in mitigating the effects of greenhouse gases, resulting in an explosion of trading regimes and proposals (Grubb, Vrolijk & Brack 1999). Most notably, the European Union launched its own emissions trading scheme (ETS) in January 2005 (Baldwin 2008). In 2004, Australian state and territory governments established the National Emissions Trading Taskforce (NETT) to develop ideas for a multi-jurisdictional ETS.

Similarly, in 2006, the former Prime Minister, Mr John Howard, established a joint government-business Task Group on Emissions Trading (TGET) (Garnaut Climate Change Review 2008). There have been a number of concerns related to the implementation of these schemes. These have included debates about their cost as an abatement producer, the costs of electricity, transport and fuel, and most notably, their potentially negative effect on Australia’ s competitive advantage through its low-cost energy resources. This essay will consider the issues associated with the ETS concept.

These arguments will be discussed and supported by analysis of the relevant costs and benefits. Australian Emissions Trading Scheme To achieve emission reduction targets, the Australian Emissions Trading Scheme (AETS) is being developed, which will require businesses to reduce their carbon emissions (Hasan & Funston 2008). The policy may follow a ‘ cap-and-trade’ scheme, which involves the capping of emissions in addition to emissions trading. Under the AETS, the caps must be consistent with reducing national emissions by at least 25 to 40% by 2020 (compared to 1990 levels) (Total Environment Centre Inc.

2008). Initially, the AETS will target major polluters; however, some impact will also be seen in small and medium-sized industries. Important issues There are a number of issues to consider in relation to the proposed AETS, as outlined below. The AETS prohibits the trading of assigned amount units (AAU). As of now, only Certified Emission Reduction (CERs), Emission Reduction Units (EMUs) and Removal Units (RMUs) from outside would be allowed to trade. AAUs will be allowed to trade only after 2013 when there will be greater certainty on the prospects of a comprehensive international ETS.

(Wilson 2009). But the future of international ETS is itself in dark. It is questionable whether the scheme is compatible with international carbon markets. It is also unclear whether the scheme would be flexible enough to account for new climate science discoveries. By requiring emission-intensive industries to buy carbon permits to cover nearly all their business activities, the Australian government may be indirectly expropriating investor businesses and profits (Wilson 2009). The design of the AETS makes it impossible to impose a border measure, notably a carbon tariff; as a result, Australian products will be less competitive in Australian and export markets compared to those of countries that do not price carbon (Wilson 2009). The issue of the use of the new source of revenue from auctioning remains unclear.

Even if the permits were initially only allocated to the energy and transport sectors, this would raise some $700 million in public revenue. Existing companies have argued for compensation to the limit of the impact of price pressures on their goods in external markets, to reduce the pressure for increased efficiency (Christoff 2007). Implementation of the AETS will also require the resolution of issues relating to financial accounting standards and tax treatment (Emissions Trading 2007).

This will require avoiding distortion between the purchase of emissions permits and other options for meeting emissions targets; that is, pursuing tax neutrality between purchasing a permit, undertaking capital expenditure to reduce or sequester emissions, investing in research and development or reducing production (Garnaut Climate Change Review 2008, p. 14).

References

:

1. Adams, P. D. (2007). Insurance against Catastrophic Climate Change: How Much Will an Emissions Trading Scheme Cost Australia? Melbourne: Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

2. Baldwin, R. (2008). Regulation Lite: The Rise of Emissions Trading. London: LSE Law, Society and Economy.

3. Christoff, P. (2007). All Smoke and Mirrors? Carbon Trading in Australia. Arena Magazine.

4. CPA Australia. (2007). Emissions trading. In the Black , 15.

5. Gailey, G. (2008). Australia’s Emissions Trading Scheme – An Opportunity. Sydney: Business Council of Australia.

6. Grubb, M., Vrolijk, C., & Brack, D. (1999). The Kyoto Protocol–a Guide and Assessment. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA)–Earthscan.

7. Hasan, A., & Funston, L. (2008). The Introduction of Australia’s Emissions Trading Scheme. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Management.

8. Johnson, A. (2007). Carbon trading scheme on the agenda. Manufacturers' Monthly , 10.

9. Jr., D. H., Klevnas, P., Nichols, A. L., & Radov, a. D. (2008). Using Emissions Trading to Combat Climate Change: Programs and Key Issues. Washington D.C.: Environmental Law Institute.

10. Nye, M., & Owens, S. (2008). Creating the UK Emission Trading Scheme: Motives and Symbolic Politics. Published Online: Wiley InterScience.

11. Pinkse, J. (2007). Corporate Intentions to Participate in Emission Trading. Business Strategy and the Environment , 2-5.

12. Preston, B., & Jones, R. (2007). The benefit to the economy of early climate change action. Canberra: CSIRO Energy Futures Forum.

13. Quiggin, J. (2007). The Prime Ministerial Task Group on Emission Trading . Agenda.

14. Richardson, D., & Denniss, R. (2008). The Impact of an Emissions Trading Scheme on State Government Budgets . The Australia Institue of Ltd.

15. Tandukar, A. (2007). Carbon scheme support . BRW , 9.

16. The Garnaut Climate Change Review. (2008). Emissions Trading Scheme Discussion Paper.

17. Total Environment Centre Inc. (2008). Key Tests for an Australian Emissions Trading Scheme.

18. Wilson, T. (2009). Australia’s delinked and non-compliant Emissions Trading Scheme. Institute of Public Affairs.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us