Essays on Public Administration as Public Sector Management Case Study

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper 'Public Administration as Public Sector Management' is a wonderful example of a management case study. Public administration is different from public sector management in some ways. Public administration primarily dwells on the implementation of the government policies in the public sectors. The civil workers serve the nation through public administration. Public sector management, on the other hand, is a paradigm break from the mode of public administration, which has been used traditionally, to new ways of administration characterized by some values. Public sector efficiency is affected by different changes both positively and negatively.

The major factors which contribute to public sector management include the role of the managers and the public value. The major reason why countries such as Australia and New Zealand have adopted the new public management in their nations is to put an end to the bureaucratic paradigm which is posed by the public administration in the countries. Differences Between The Public Administration And The Public Sector ManagementThe new public sector management paradigm is characterized by bureaucracy, use of the scientific model of management in the workplace, and the policy administration divide into various public sectors.

The public administration was mostly applied in different countries in the 19th century. The public administration was characterized by service providers in a monopolistic way. The public administration was done away with in many countries due to its nature of market-oriented management. Public sector management is based on some values which lead to changes in the market phases making the paradigm different from the others. Firstly, the new management is aimed at focusing on professional management to increase the competence of the public sectors.

Secondly, the public sector management requires the employment of the measures and standards which are explicit to increase performance and public value (Rhodes 2007, p. 408). The new management is also focused on controlling the output in the public sectors to manage the markets efficiently. Additionally, unlike the public administration whose aim is dominating in the market monopolistically, the public management looks forward to increasing the competitiveness of the public sector through employing the private sector management practices.

References

Adams, D. 2001. Community in Public Policy:Fad or Foundation? Australian Journal of Public Administration, pp. 15-17.

Arnaboldi, M. 2015. Performance Management in the Public Sector: The Ultimate Challenge. Finanacial Accountability and Management, pp. 6-7.

Barret, P. 2000. Balancing Accountability and Efficiency in a More Competitive Public Sector Environment. Australian Journal of Public Administration, pp. 58.

Dunleavy, P. 2005. New Public Management is Dead-Long Live Digital Era. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, p. 470.

Dunleavy, P. (2005). New Public Management Is Dead-Long Live Digital-Era Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, p. 497.

Head, B. W. 2005. Community Engagement: Participation on Whose Terms? Australian Journal of Political Science, p. 442.

Kluvers, R. 2001. Program Budgeting and Accountability in Local Government. Australian Journal of Public Administration, p. 37.

Lapsley, I. 2009. New Public Management: The Cruellest Intervention of the Human Spirit. Journal of Accounting, Finance and Business Studies, p. 5.

Leigh, A. 2003. Thinking Ahead: Strategic Forecast and Governement. Australian Journal of Public Administration, p. 4.

O'Flynn, J. 2007. From New Public Management to Public Value: Paradigmatic Chang and Managerial Implications. The Australian Journal of Public Administration, p. 354.

Rhodes, R. 2007. The Limits to Public Value, or Rescuing Responsible Government from the Platonic Guardians. The Australian Journal of Public Administration, p. 408.

Tiernan, A. 2004. Advising Howard: Interpreting Changes in Advisory and Support Structures for the Prime Minister of Australia. Australian Journal of Political Science, p. 320.

Tiernan, A. 2008. The Council for the Australian Federation: A New Structure of Australian Federation. Australian Journal of Public Administration, p. 131.

Wanna, J. 2003. Traditions of Australian Governance. Public Administration, p. 88.

Wines, G. 2006. Comparing Australian Commonwealth, State and Territory Budget Balance Numbers. National Council of the Instituteof Public Administration Australia, p. 84.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us