Essays on The Pros and Cons of the Different Methods of Improving Public Sector Ethics Coursework

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "The Pros and Cons of the Different Methods of Improving Public Sector Ethics" is an outstanding example of management coursework.   Ethics is a term commonly used in everyday life. The discussion of ethics in the public sector has increased over the years. Ethics is termed as the study of morality. It is also considered an important value worth pursuing in life. It is relative, it is honourable. However, what is honourable in one society or community may not be typically honourable in another. Ethics being honourable depends on a number of factors such as moral values and world views to name a few.

Ethics in public administration is a lengthy topic (Lewis and Gilman, 2012). In the public sector, the term ethics addresses key principles of every public administrator’ s duties and responsibilities as a steward to the public (Lewis and Gilman, 2012). Ethics in the public sector are accountability standards where the public can scrutinize any work being done by a public administrator. Decisions are made in regard to ethical principles that the public would consider as correct.

Public sector ethics tend to create an atmosphere around governmental operations. There is widespread concern about nepotism, theft, bribery, and corruption in the public sector (Mafunisa, 2000). Therefore, there is concern about whether it is possible to improve public sector ethics. This paper will highlight the philosophical concept of ethics that would provide an understanding of human values and what constitutes right conduct. The paper will also mention some unethical issues faced by the public sector and ways of improving public sector ethics. We live in a society where uncertainty has crept about basic norms and values and a good number of decisions today are complex morally and ethically (Bazerman and Mahzarin, 2004).

The public sector requires an acceptable and clear moral and ethical foundation in order to succeed. Therefore, it is desirable to create a recipe for ethical behaviour among public officials based on a commitment to moral norms and values. Today, it is difficult to establish the meaning of ethics since different people have different views about what is good and what is bad (Bazerman and Mahzarin, 2004). Ethics can be defined as the study of what is right for human beings.

In the above definition, it is clear that an individual is able to make a decision to accept or reject a given ethical rule as being the right way of behaving.  

References

Bazerman, H. & Banaj, R June, 2004, “The Social Psychology of Ordinary Ethical Failures.” Social Justice Research, vol. 17, no. 2, p. 111-115.

Brown, A 2008, Whistleblowing in the Australian public sector enhancing the theory and practice of internal witness management in public sector organisations, Acton, A.C.T: ANU E Press.

Fisher, C 2013, Business ethics and values, City, Pearson.

Kieh, G 2014, Reconstructing the authoritarian state in Africa, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, Routledge.

Lewis, C & Gilman, S 2012, The ethics challenge in public service : a problem-solving guide, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, A Wiley Imprint.

Liles, D 2014, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security ICCWS-2014, Reading, Academic Publishing International Ltd.

Maesschalck, J 2004, The impact of new public management reforms on public servants’ ethics: Towards a theory, Public Administration, vol. 82, no. 2, p. 465–489.

Mafunisa, M 2000, Public service ethics, Kenwyn, Juta.

Niamh, K 2007, “More than writing on a wall: Evaluating the Role that Code of Ethics Play in Securing Accountability of Public Sector Decision-Makers”, The Australian Journal of Public Administration, vol. 66, no. 1, pp.112-120

Rabin, J 2003, Encyclopedia of public administration and public policy, New York, Marcel Dekker.

Shah, A 2007, Performance accountability and combating corruption, Washington, D.C: World Bank.

Van Wart, M 2003, Public-sector leadership theory: An assessment, Public Administration Review, vol. 63, no. 2, p. 214-228.

Wasden, L July, 2007, Office of the Attorney General, Idaho, Ethics in Government Manual.

West, H 2004, An introduction to Mill's utilitarian ethics, Cambridge, U.K., Cambridge University Press.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us